Posted by admin on May 7th, 2010 | No Comments
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control did not proceed in a manner contrary to law or in excess of its jurisdiction when it directed an administrative law judge, who was not a judge with the Office of Administrative Hearings, to hear and decide protests against casino’s liquor license application because Business and Professions Code Sec. 24210 authorized the department to employ its own administrative...
Posted by admin on Mar 1st, 2010 | No Comments
Indian tribe’s casino development did not constitute a “project” of city—which entered into municipal services agreement with tribe—under the California Environmental Quality Act where the city had no legal authority over the property upon which the casino was to be situated, and agreement by city to support tribe’s efforts to acquire the land for the casino and to obtain the requisite...
Posted by admin on Feb 28th, 2010 | No Comments
The development arm of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community announced plans this week to build a 156-room Marriott hotel, the first ever for the company on U.S. tribal land.
Salt River Devco is developing a hotel site southeast of Pima Road and McDonald Drive adjacent to the Chaparral Business Center.
Marriott International will operate the hotel under its Courtyard by Marriott brand. It is...
Posted by admin on Dec 28th, 2009 | No Comments
Disenrollment of plaintiffs from Indian tribe, which resulted in a loss of access to certain facilities, did not pose a severe restraint on plaintiffs’ liberty and therefore did not amount to a detention. Alleged potential threat of future eviction was also insufficient. As federal appellate court lacked jurisdiction to review direct appeals of tribal disenrollment decisions, plaintiffs could not...
Posted by admin on Dec 2nd, 2009 | No Comments
November 9, 2009:
In an action against the U.S. for encroachment onto plaintiffs’ easement, the dismissal of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Quiet Title Act is vacated where the district court needed to determine whether plaintiffs could assert jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. This case involves land held in trust by the United States for the Mooretown...
Posted by admin on Sep 13th, 2009 | No Comments
Courtesy of CA Governors office:
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today announced the signing of a compact with the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake, located in Lake County. The compact follows a similar blueprint of the compacts Governor Schwarzenegger has previously negotiated in that it provides important benefits to the state, protects both employees and patrons and provides for environmental protections.
“I...
Posted by admin on Jun 24th, 2009 | No Comments
Tribal Economic Development Bonds – Section 1402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”) provides for allocation of $2 billion for tribal economic development bonds. Tribes are eligible to apply for the first allocation of $1 billion under the ARRA for projects not exceeding $30 million for a broad range of governmental projects to be used in the exercise of any essential governmental...
Posted by admin on Jun 10th, 2009 | No Comments
In Barona v. Yee the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”) held that federal law does not preempt application of California sales tax on construction materials purchased for a tribal project by a non-Indian subcontractor from non-Indian vendors, but delivered to a tribe’s reservation. If not overturned by the Court of Appeals en banc or reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, this...